This was originally meant as a comment to Norbert Haupt, but it became much longer than anticipated.
~~~~~~~
With everything becoming digital I am surprised to see that Barnes and Noble treat their Nook as a novelty rather than an essential. Very few stores have a hands on version to try.
What I expected in getting my eReader is this: browsing through Borders, and finding a book, but preferring to have it on your eReader/Kindle/Nook/iPad, being able to then turn around and download it on one of their terminals. Or when not finding the book on the shelf, consoling yourself with the digital version by going to the terminal and getting it.
The problem is the fact that publishing houses are still separating the two versions of the book, instead of trying to reconcile them and bring them together.
I got my eReader and was 100% enthusiastic. But, I still find myself preferring physical books. A lot of it has to do with the fact that I am on dial-up, and my laptop conflicts with Sony’s eLibrary.
When the format of ebooks switched from what Sony first used, it meant my eReader would need to be updated. But I still haven’t sent it in. Further isolating me from my eReader.
I have dreams of being a published author, I don’t know publishing, or how it works at all. But if I were to be published, I want to be able to tangibly hold my accomplishment. It is visceral.
Now with the advent of the eBooks, it seems really, you just need the agent and the editor.
But ‘Publishing House’ is a very clever statement. You think of warmth and acceptance: a support net, shield and champion. And writing requires a lot of that. Just from writing classes, empathetic/sympathetic writers can rip into each other, so when theres nothing between the author and public, I imagine something very scary and very intimidating.
A Publishing House stands by the writer and take flack for them, or comfort them even if the only motivator is that their own credibility is at stake, or just from the investment in that author.
But not having experienced it, I simply don’t know the truth from the ideal. But I’d still like to believe in the ideal. From what I know of writers, we want to write and not have to deal with everything else, thats what the agents and publishing houses are for.
Personally, if anything I wrote was picked up by a publishing house, I wouldn’t care if I signed my soul away, I would just want it out there. And while publishing houses are a company, as the New Yorker Article states, the houses bank on popular and backlist books to make money. They give advances on the books they publish completely gambling on whether or not they make it back.
In the book I’ve been plugging lately, Publish This Book, Markley got a $5000 from SourceBooks, an independant publisher. I bought it from Borders, retail price is $15. Pretending that SB gets every cent of it, and thats the price it sells everywhere, its would 334 books to make back that advance. 334 doesn’t seem like a lot, but Steve Jobs even says in the interview, “Forty percent of the people in the US read one book or less last year.” (My mom as far as I know, doesn’t own a book, my dad hasn’t finished the two he has) Consider the number of books to choose from. Consider the lack of press for the book.
Amazon and most companies are not going to do that. They are selling at a loss, but believe in gaining the profit shares first. Without someone intercepting, I probably would end up signing my soul to Amazon.
At the very least, every english major I’ve ever met wants to be published.
Amazon is a company, more product equals more money.
I am not saying they would, but it’s possible, that by wanting the most books available, to boast the biggest library, they could pad it with so many young/new writers, it becomes even harder to find the good books and good authors. They’re about helping people find whatever they’re looking for for the cheapest price, I have no idea how much they think about product quality.
While it is comforting knowing that Apple and Steve Jobs are there to save the day, it’s unclear how long they’ll keep that cape.
The Publishing Houses need to evolve to accomodate eBooks and solve the problem on their own to continue to be an establishment, because they are a service to and work for their writers. But they’re just trying to stay afloat. And really hurting the authors it seems.
I don’t have a solution, but I don’t think they should go away. They know books, they have the experience, and without them it will all just disappear. A book is a book is a book, doesn’t matter how it get to the people, on paper, stone or computers. Without them, authors could flounder, and companies like Amazon won’t know how to interact with authors.
